michaelpingeryawssite

Bend it side of polotic a snap shot Size up!

Category: /Bening/Stress/Polotic/

(823 views)

0

This is Michael Pinger I was going to figure out if or could we be about the same different or better with and if Hilary. I found out using a stress formula and a little conjecture to fill variables for inerta and size of square. It was simple really for the snap shot. The funny thing when you put the stress on e^power of of stress to carry HIlary maybe in the long run the better candidate keeping a neater package....with Trump who one notice has a bark and blow Blatter system while doing a lot of frivolous entertaining being a frothy dog and will become a treat to the system norm as well pocket book in the long run. Interesting!


I mentioned some time back about going to work the numbers and see difference and out come between Hilary or Donald T. It took me a while to figure out a starting place for a model and Thank you Static and strength of materials bending stress. Gave by personality and Girl a 3 and trump a 4 for a block 3 by 4 so I could use moment of inertia formula 1/12(B)(H^3) =I one for H and one for T for weight I just used three thirds for good sense being her two thirds with Obama before her and one third mr T...and went to work coming up with stress bending for Hilary of .1875 and for Mr T of .2962 this would be a force per term thinking coming and going at zero with a little thinking. One way to think of it is that Trump has a lot more bending stress he ridged ...but leads to extra's odd...yet so Hilary has only a bending force of .1875 which is understanding of the moment and beings on stage against the rest and Trump a radical of the Line Rise run. Trump had more momentum as a radical than Hilary who by driving as a politician a keener line to politics. By Michael Pinger 10/23/18...things have changed in weight and lengths a bit since then but seems we are right about at it with part sleepy.

---

Favorite Favorite  Comment Comment  Share Share